Feature Analysis
January 7, 202410 min readMultimodal LLM APIs Compared: GPT-4V vs Gemini Vision vs Claude 3
Compare vision, audio, and multimodal capabilities across leading LLM providers to find the best fit for your needs.
As AI models evolve beyond text, choosing the right multimodal LLM API has become critical for applications requiring vision, audio, and cross-modal understanding. This comprehensive analysis compares the leading multimodal offerings from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.
Quick Comparison Matrix
Feature | GPT-4V/GPT-4o | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Claude 3 Vision |
---|---|---|---|
Image Understanding | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Excellent |
Video Processing | ❌ Not Available | ✅ Native Support | ❌ Not Available |
Audio Input | ✅ GPT-4o Only | ✅ Native Support | ❌ Not Available |
Document OCR | ✅ Very Good | ✅ Excellent | ✅ Very Good |
Max Image Resolution | Detail: high mode | Native resolution | 5MB limit |
Context Window | 128K tokens | 2M tokens | 200K tokens |
Vision Capabilities
- • Object detection and recognition
- • Scene understanding
- • OCR and text extraction
- • Chart and diagram analysis
- • Mathematical equation reading
- • UI/UX screenshot analysis
Video Features
- • Frame-by-frame analysis
- • Temporal understanding
- • Action recognition
- • Scene transitions
- • Content summarization
- • Event detection
Audio Processing
- • Speech transcription
- • Multi-speaker detection
- • Sound event recognition
- • Music analysis
- • Emotion detection
- • Language identification
Detailed Model Analysis
GPT-4V / GPT-4o (OpenAI)
Industry-leading vision capabilities with optional audio
Strengths:
- Superior reasoning and instruction following[1]
- Excellent chart and diagram understanding[2]
- Strong OCR capabilities across languages[3]
- GPT-4o adds native audio understanding[4]
Limitations:
- No native video support
- Higher pricing compared to alternatives[5]
- Audio only available in GPT-4o variant
Best For:
Complex visual reasoning, document analysis, UI/UX testing, medical imaging analysis
Gemini 1.5 Pro (Google)
Most versatile with native video and audio support
Strengths:
- Native video processing up to hours of content[6]
- Largest context window (2M tokens)[7]
- Unified multimodal architecture[8]
- Competitive pricing for high-volume use
Limitations:
- Occasional hallucinations in complex scenes
- Regional availability restrictions
- Rate limits on video processing
Best For:
Video content analysis, long-form document processing, surveillance systems, content moderation
Claude 3 Vision (Anthropic)
Privacy-focused with strong safety features
Strengths:
- Best-in-class safety and content filtering[9]
- Excellent technical diagram understanding
- Strong privacy guarantees
- Detailed explanations and reasoning
Limitations:
- No video or audio support
- 5MB image size limit
- More conservative outputs
Best For:
Enterprise deployments, regulated industries, educational content, technical documentation
Performance Benchmarks
Benchmark | GPT-4V | Gemini 1.5 Pro | Claude 3 Opus | Test Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
MMMU | 56.8% | 58.5% | 59.4% | Multi-discipline |
MathVista | 49.9% | 52.1% | 50.5% | Math reasoning |
AI2D | 78.2% | 80.3% | 88.1% | Diagram understanding |
ChartQA | 78.5% | 81.3% | 80.8% | Chart analysis |
DocVQA | 88.4% | 90.9% | 89.3% | Document QA |
Pricing and Limits
Model | Image Size Limit | Audio Limit | Video Limit | Pricing |
---|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4V | 20MB[10] | N/A | N/A | $0.01/1K tokens |
GPT-4o | 20MB[9] | 25MB audio files[9] | <60s clips[13] | $2.50-30/1M tokens[10] |
Gemini 1.5 Pro | Hundreds of MB[11] | Multi-hour audio[11] | Up to 1 hour[11] | $0.00125-0.005/1K tokens[11] |
Claude 3 Opus | 5MB[12] | N/A | N/A | $15/1M input tokens[12] |
Implementation Guide
Quick Start Examples
Vision API Calls
All three providers follow similar patterns for image analysis:
- Base64 encode images or provide URLs
- Include images in the messages array
- Specify detail level for optimal processing
- Handle multi-image inputs in single requests
Best Practices
- Resize images to optimal dimensions before sending
- Use appropriate compression for your use case
- Batch multiple images when possible
- Implement retry logic for rate limits
- Cache responses for repeated queries
References
- [1] OpenAI. "GPT-4V System Card" (2023)
- [2] Liu, H., et al. "Evaluating GPT-4V on Visual Math Problem Solving" arXiv preprint (2023)
- [3] Shi, J., et al. "GPT-4V(ision) for Robotics: Multimodal Task Planning from Human Demonstration" (2023)
- [4] OpenAI. "Hello GPT-4o" Blog post (2024)
- [5] OpenAI. "Pricing" (2024)
- [6] Reid, M., et al. "Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context" (2024)
- [7] Google DeepMind. "Gemini Capabilities" (2024)
- [8] Gemini Team. "Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models" (2023)
- [9] Anthropic. "Introducing the Claude 3 Model Family" (2024)
- [10] Artificial Analysis. "LLM Model Pricing and Performance Comparison" (2024)
- [11] Google AI. "Gemini 1.5 Pro Technical Specifications" (2024)
- [12] Anthropic. "Claude 3 Model Card and Evaluation" (2024)
- [13] Zhou, P., et al. "Video Understanding in Large Vision-Language Models: A Comparative Study" arXiv preprint (2024)