Performance
Model Benchmarks
Real-world performance comparisons across all major AI models
Overall Performance Rankings
| Model | Quality Score | Speed (tokens/s) | Cost per 1M tokens | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4 Turbo | 95/100 | 40 | $10.00 | Best Overall |
| Claude 3 Opus | 94/100 | 35 | $15.00 | Best for Analysis |
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | 82/100 | 90 | $0.50 | Best Value |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | 91/100 | 45 | $7.00 | Best Context |
| Llama 3 70B | 88/100 | 60 | $0.80 | Best Open Source |
Task-Specific Performance
Code Generation
GPT-4 Turbo
96%
Claude 3 Opus
94%
Gemini 1.5 Pro
89%
Creative Writing
Claude 3 Opus
97%
GPT-4 Turbo
93%
Llama 3 70B
85%
Data Analysis
Claude 3 Opus
98%
GPT-4 Turbo
95%
Gemini 1.5 Pro
92%
Customer Support
GPT-3.5 Turbo
90%
Claude 3 Haiku
88%
Llama 3 8B
82%
Speed Benchmarks
Response Time Comparison
Time to First Token
GPT-3.5 Turbo0.2s
Claude 3 Haiku0.3s
Llama 3 8B0.4s
GPT-4 Turbo0.8s
Claude 3 Opus1.2s
Tokens per Second
GPT-3.5 Turbo90 t/s
Claude 3 Haiku85 t/s
Llama 3 70B60 t/s
Gemini 1.5 Pro45 t/s
GPT-4 Turbo40 t/s
Max Context Processing
Gemini 1.5 Pro1M tokens
Claude 3 Opus200K tokens
GPT-4 Turbo128K tokens
Claude 3 Haiku100K tokens
GPT-3.5 Turbo16K tokens
Cost Efficiency Analysis
Quality per Dollar
Best for High-Volume Simple Tasks
GPT-3.5 Turbo
20x cheaper than GPT-4 with 85% of the quality for basic tasks
Best Balance
Claude 3 Sonnet
5x cheaper than Opus with 90% of the capability
Best for Complex Tasks
GPT-4 Turbo
Highest quality-to-cost ratio for advanced use cases
Best Open Source Value
Llama 3 70B
Comparable to GPT-3.5 at 60% of the cost
Methodology
Our benchmarks are based on real-world usage across thousands of API calls:
- • Quality scores based on human evaluation and automated testing
- • Speed metrics measured from our infrastructure with optimal conditions
- • Cost calculations include all token charges at standard rates
- • Task-specific scores from domain expert evaluations
- • Updated monthly with the latest model versions